Encouraging developments in Assisted Driving System says Thatcham 

November 25, 2021
Encouraging developments in Assisted Driving System says Thatcham 
Share:

Thatcham Research and Euro NCAP say they are encouraged by the results of their latest Assisted Driving Gradings, which show all seven of the mainstream vehicle manufacturers whose cars were tested, are committed to fitting robust Assisted Driving technology at every price point.


The world-first Assisted Driving Grading assessments were introduced in October 2020 and are designed to support the sensible marketing and safe adoption of Assisted Driving technology. Seven new cars were assessed during the latest tests. Five of them were pure Electric Vehicles (EVs), reflecting the increasing popularity of this type of vehicle within the new car market.

Each car was evaluated and rated for the level of assistance, level of driver engagement and effectiveness of the safety back-up offered by their Assisted Driving systems. The best systems are said to strike a good balance between the amount of assistance provided and how much they do to ensure drivers are engaged and aware of their responsibilities behind the wheel.

Matthew Avery, Thatcham Research’s Chief Research Strategy Officer, said, “Assisted Driving technology can be a great comfort feature, especially when supporting drivers on long motorway journeys. But it must strike the right balance between offering a meaningful level of assistance and ensuring that motorists don’t sit back and let the system do the driving. We’ve seen the dangerous outcomes on roads around the world when drivers become convinced that their role is secondary.”

Last year’s Assisted Driving Grading results prompted Thatcham Research to raise concerns that some carmakers were overselling the supposed self-driving capability of their technology. The naming, marketing and performance of Tesla’s ‘Autopilot’ system was highlighted as a concern.

Reassuringly, the capability of all the cars in this year’s assessments is being described correctly and consumers are not being led to believe they are driving a car equipped with Automated functionality.

Mathew said, “All seven cars we’ve just tested are clearly marketed as having ‘driver assistance’ functions, not ‘automated’. These systems are engineered to involve and support the driver in a very cooperative manner. They’re certainly not trying to offer automation, where the driving task can be relinquished to the vehicle, and we strongly believe that’s the right thing to do.”

BMW’s iX3 emerged as the top performer earning a ‘very good’ grading, while the Ford Mustang Mach-E and Cupra Formentor both secured a ‘good’ grading.

The Polestar 2 and Hyundai Ioniq 5 earned a ‘moderate’ grading, while the less expensive Toyota Yaris and Opel/Vauxhall Mokka-e were both handed an ‘entry’ grading for the solid core performance of their Assisted Driving technology.


 
PREVIOUS ARTICLE
Schaeffler and DENSO team up for FEAD-focused ‘Tea-break Training’ 
NEXT ARTICLE
Precision Protection from Blue Print Fuel Filters

More from AFTERMARKET

Toyota Hiace - Suspension knocking

Toyota Hiace - Suspension knocking

icon One of the most annoying sound...
Quentin Le Hetet to speak at Schaeffler REPXPERT Conference

Quentin Le Hetet to speak at Schaeffler REPXPERT Conference

icon Quentin Le Hetet, Country Dire...
New torsional vibration dampers from Continental

New torsional vibration dampers from Continental

icon Continental has added five new...
Porsche produces some hot seats 

Porsche produces some hot seats 

icon Using its Pepita houndstooth p...
NGK Spark Plugs, the classic choice
 

NGK Spark Plugs, the classic choice  

icon Classic vehicle were once the...
Ford EcoBlue 2.0 timing belt issues

Ford EcoBlue 2.0 timing belt issues

icon Dayco is urging workshops to b...

More from AUTOBIZ